At the center of your operation is a control system. It's the brain, made of processors and parts that have worked well for years. But now, those parts are getting old. The original makers no longer support them, they're hard to find, and they cause a lot of worry. Many factories are running on old equipment without a real plan, which is a huge risk. It's time to stop waiting for a breakdown and start managing the system you have.
To get control, you first need to see what you have. Planning for old parts starts with a complete list of every single component in your control system. This isn't just the big hardware like I/O modules; it also includes the small things like software and firmware versions, which are key for getting parts to work together.
Once you have your list, you can turn it into a tool for seeing your risks. A risk chart, or criticality matrix, is perfect for this. It helps you show everyone, from the factory floor to the main office, which parts are the biggest problems. You can rank each part—like the main processor (CPU), power supply, or operator screen (HMI)—with a simple formula: How Bad is a Failure? × How Hard is it to Replace? × How Long Does it Take to Get a New One? The final number shows you exactly where to focus first.
Criticality Assessment Matrix Template
| Impact of Failure | Low Probability | Medium Probability | High Probability | Critical Probability |
| Critical | Plan Proactively: High impact, but not likely to fail soon. Watch these parts and make a long-term plan for spares. | Urgent Action: High impact and a medium chance of failure. Make these a priority for replacement and find spare parts now. | Immediate Mitigation: A huge impact and a high chance of failure. These are your biggest risks. Start planning to replace or upgrade them right away. | Systemic Risk: The worst-case scenario. If you have parts in this box, a full system upgrade should be your top priority. |
| High | Monitor & Plan: A failure would be serious. Keep an eye on these parts and start thinking about where to find replacements. | Proactive Sparing: A high impact is a big threat. Stock spare parts for these and figure out how you would replace them. | Plan Replacement: The risk of failure is too high. Schedule a replacement for the next time you have planned downtime. | High-Priority Upgrade: This part is a major weak point. Speed up your plans to modernize it. |
| Medium | Standard Monitoring: Check on these parts during your normal routines. Update their status once a year. | Opportunistic Sparing: If you find spare parts for a good price, buy them. If not, just keep watching them. | Evaluate Alternatives: Start looking for other parts or solutions that could work as a replacement. | Schedule for Phase-Out: This part is not reliable. Make a plan to remove it from your system. |
| Low | Reactive Strategy: Low impact and low chance of failure. It's okay to wait for these to fail before replacing them. | Reactive Strategy: A failure won't cause much trouble. No need to stock spares. | Document Alternatives: Figure out what you could use as a substitute if one fails, but you don't need to keep them in stock. | Deprecate: If you can, take this part out of the system when you're doing other maintenance. |
After mapping out your parts, you need to give each one a lifecycle status. This helps you predict future problems. There are four main stages:
Finally, you need to show what these risks mean in terms of money. The Annualized Downtime Risk Cost is a simple way to do this. The formula is:
Annualized Risk Cost=(Cost per Downtime Hour)×(Hours of Downtime per Failure)×(Annual Probability of Failure)
This is easier to figure out than it looks. An hour of downtime in a factory can cost anywhere from $10,000 to over $250,000. The hours of downtime depend on how long it takes to get a replacement part, which could be days or weeks for an old part. You can find the chance of failure from your own maintenance history or from public data. With this formula, an "old PLC processor" is no longer just a technical issue. It's a "$500,000 annual risk," which makes it much easier for everyone to understand why it's important to invest in a solution.
Once you know your risks, you can build a smarter plan for your spare parts. You don't need to stock everything. The idea is to stock the right parts to protect against your biggest problems. A simple formula can help you decide how many spares to keep:
Minimum Stock Level=(Annual Failure Rate×Lead Time in Years)+Safety Stock
The failure rate can come from your own records. Safety stock is your backup for surprises, like a sudden failure or a shipping delay. But for old parts, the most important and unpredictable factor is Lead Time. For a new part, you know how long it will take to arrive. For an old part, it's a guess. A part that took a week to find last year might take three months this year, or it might be gone for good.
This changes how you think about inventory. For old systems, you're not just managing stock; you're managing the risk that your supply could vanish. The cost of keeping a spare part on the shelf is no longer just an expense—it's insurance against a long, costly shutdown.
So, which parts need this insurance the most? Here is a "must-have" list of spares to focus on first:
Just having a part isn't enough. You need to know it will work. A spare part with the wrong firmware is as useless as no spare at all. Your records must keep careful notes on what works with what, including firmware versions and any other special requirements.
When you can't buy from the original maker, you have to look at the secondary market. To do this safely, you need to look in different places so you don't rely on just one source. These places include:
Finding a part is only the first step. You have to check it to make sure it's good. Never take a part out of a shipping box and put it straight into your spare parts cabinet. You need a solid process for checking every part that comes in. This should include:
When you buy an old part, you're not just paying for the part itself; you're paying for the confidence that it works. A good supplier invests in testing to remove the risk. So, when you talk to a supplier, don't just ask about the price. Ask about their process. How do you test your parts? What is your warranty? What happens if a part is dead on arrival (DOA)?
A good supplier will be open about this and will offer clear terms, such as:
A great plan for spare parts can be ruined by a leaky roof or a dusty shelf. A spare part that doesn't work when you need it is a huge waste. Proper storage is something you have to do all the time, not just once.
Your storage room for electronics needs to have a controlled environment. The key things to manage are:
One of the most important—and most forgotten—parts of maintaining spares is testing them from time to time. Electronic parts, especially capacitors, can go bad over time even when they're not being used. It's like a battery losing its charge on a shelf. If you suddenly apply power to a part that has been sitting for years, it can fail completely.
To prevent this, you should have a schedule to power up your critical spares. Every one or two years, take parts like CPUs and power supplies out of storage, put them in a test system, and turn them on for a few hours. This keeps them healthy and confirms that your "insurance policy" is still good.
To manage all this, you need a detailed inventory record. It should track more than just how many parts you have. For each critical spare, your record should include:
Thinking of your spares as assets that can degrade, not just sit there, is the sign of a strong maintenance program.
The information from your risk chart helps you move from fixing things when they break to replacing them before they fail. The parts with the highest risk should be replaced during planned shutdowns. This is much cheaper and less disruptive than an emergency shutdown caused by a surprise failure.
When you replace a high-risk part, don't just throw the old one away. That old part still has value. Many companies that sell old parts also have programs to buy your used equipment. They will fix it, test it, and sell it to another company that needs it.
This creates a circular economy for automation parts and changes the cost of an upgrade. The cost of replacing a high-risk part is no longer just an expense. It becomes:
Net Replacement Cost=(Cost of New Part)−(Value of Recovered Part)
This turns a cost into a smart investment, which is much easier to get approved. You're not just spending money; you're reducing risk and getting value back at the same time.
Repair vs. Replace Decision Framework
| Consider REPAIR When... | Consider REPLACE When... |
| The repair cost is less than half the cost of a replacement. | The part is officially obsolete, with no support from the maker. |
| You can afford the downtime needed for the repair. | The part has failed many times, suggesting it's worn out. |
| You have a trusted repair shop that offers a warranty. | You are already planning a bigger system upgrade, and the new part fits that plan. |
| The part is not critical to your production. | A newer part would give you big improvements in performance or safety. |
After you replace any part, the job isn't done until you've fully tested the system. This is called regression testing—it's a process to make sure the change you made didn't accidentally break something else. Your checklist after a replacement should include:
For most places, shutting down to replace an entire control system all at once isn't an option. It costs too much and takes too long. A better way is a gradual, step-by-step upgrade that lets you modernize your system over time without stopping production.
This approach is based on proven upgrade paths. For example, many plants have successfully moved from older systems like Siemens S5 to the newer S7, or from Allen-Bradley PLC-5 to the modern ControlLogix family.
The key piece of technology that makes this possible is a protocol gateway. Think of a gateway as a universal translator. It lets devices that speak different languages (or different industrial protocols) talk to each other. An old I/O rack can communicate with a brand-new processor through a gateway.
This is a game-changer because it lets you upgrade on your own schedule. You can create a hybrid system—a mix of old and new parts working together. You can replace the most critical part first, like an old CPU, and use gateways to let it control your existing older I/O. Then, later, you can replace the I/O racks one by one, spreading the cost and work over several years.
This turns a huge, risky project into a flexible, manageable process. It lets you match your spending to your real-world needs. The main goal for every step should be simple: every change should lower your risk and make it easier to find spare parts.
To use these ideas, follow this checklist to build a strong and smart plan for managing your spare parts and their lifecycle.
Managing aging control systems is not a matter of luck; it's a matter of strategy. A proactive approach, grounded in rigorous risk assessment, intelligent inventory management, and carefully planned migration, can transform a major operational liability into a manageable, predictable cost. You don't have to be at the mercy of obsolescence. Need help building a robust obsolescence plan or sourcing hard-to-find DCS, PLC, or HMI spares? A specialist partner, such as Amikong, can help you build your parts list and dramatically cut the risk of unplanned downtime. Reach out to us today.


Copyright Notice © 2004-2024 amikong.com All rights reserved
Disclaimer: We are not an authorized distributor or distributor of the product manufacturer of this website, The product may have older date codes or be an older series than that available direct from the factory or authorized dealers. Because our company is not an authorized distributor of this product, the Original Manufacturer’s warranty does not apply.While many DCS PLC products will have firmware already installed, Our company makes no representation as to whether a DSC PLC product will or will not have firmware and, if it does have firmware, whether the firmware is the revision level that you need for your application. Our company also makes no representations as to your ability or right to download or otherwise obtain firmware for the product from our company, its distributors, or any other source. Our company also makes no representations as to your right to install any such firmware on the product. Our company will not obtain or supply firmware on your behalf. It is your obligation to comply with the terms of any End-User License Agreement or similar document related to obtaining or installing firmware.